Blue Sage Data Systems
A real concern Omaha leaders raise

We're behind on AI and don't know where to start

You're not behind. Almost no one is ahead. McKinsey's 2025 data shows 88% of organizations regularly use AI, but only ~6% qualify as high performers. The honest answer for Omaha mid-market leaders isn't a transformation plan — it's a much smaller first move.

Lincoln companies asking the same? See the Lincoln view →

Text Rosey · Schedule a call →

Common questions from Omaha leaders

Are we actually behind?
Probably less than you think. McKinsey 2025 found 88% of organizations use AI somewhere, and Express-Harris found 79% of U.S. companies do — meaning yes, almost everyone is using something. But only ~6% of organizations qualify as 'AI high performers' attributing 5%+ EBIT impact, and nearly two-thirds haven't begun scaling. The race is much earlier than the headlines suggest.
What's the right first move?
Pick one workflow and make it 10% better with AI in the loop. Not a transformation. Not a strategy doc. Not a vendor evaluation. One workflow, one role, one pattern of work that AI can change today. The first compounding step is more valuable than the perfect plan.
Don't we need a strategy first?
Strategy without one shipped use case usually becomes a planning exercise that doesn't ship. McKinsey's data shows the high performers' differentiator is workflow redesign — they're nearly 3x more likely to have fundamentally redesigned individual workflows. Strategy emerges from running real workflow redesigns; you can't strategize your way to the answer.
What if we pick the wrong workflow?
Almost any workflow that's document-heavy, intake-heavy, or first-draft-heavy will work as a starting point. The right ones are usually obvious to the people who do the work — they're the painful, repetitive, time-consuming parts. Ask. The exception isn't worth optimizing for; pick something visible and start.
We have a small team. Do we hire someone first?
Usually no. Hiring an AI specialist into a team that hasn't done its first AI workflow rarely produces results — there's no AI-shaped problem yet for them to solve. Better sequence: ship one workflow, document what was hard, then decide whether the next thing needs a hire or an external partner or both.
Is there a worst version of 'starting'?
Yes — buying a tool license without picking a use case, hoping the tool will reveal what to do. That's how you get a $2,000/month Copilot bill nobody uses and a board question you can't answer. Pick the use case first; tools second.

Sources

Related

→ Start here

Text Rosey to begin.

Rosey is our executive-assistant bot. Text the number below — she'll ask two questions, offer three calendar slots, and put a 30-minute call on Jim's calendar.

Text Rosey · Schedule a call →

or call 415 481 2629