A real concern Omaha leaders raise
We're behind on AI and don't know where to start
You're not behind. Almost no one is ahead. McKinsey's 2025 data shows 88% of organizations regularly use AI, but only ~6% qualify as high performers. The honest answer for Omaha mid-market leaders isn't a transformation plan — it's a much smaller first move.
Text Rosey · Schedule a call →Common questions from Omaha leaders
- Are we actually behind?
- Probably less than you think. McKinsey 2025 found 88% of organizations use AI somewhere, and Express-Harris found 79% of U.S. companies do — meaning yes, almost everyone is using something. But only ~6% of organizations qualify as 'AI high performers' attributing 5%+ EBIT impact, and nearly two-thirds haven't begun scaling. The race is much earlier than the headlines suggest.
- What's the right first move?
- Pick one workflow and make it 10% better with AI in the loop. Not a transformation. Not a strategy doc. Not a vendor evaluation. One workflow, one role, one pattern of work that AI can change today. The first compounding step is more valuable than the perfect plan.
- Don't we need a strategy first?
- Strategy without one shipped use case usually becomes a planning exercise that doesn't ship. McKinsey's data shows the high performers' differentiator is workflow redesign — they're nearly 3x more likely to have fundamentally redesigned individual workflows. Strategy emerges from running real workflow redesigns; you can't strategize your way to the answer.
- What if we pick the wrong workflow?
- Almost any workflow that's document-heavy, intake-heavy, or first-draft-heavy will work as a starting point. The right ones are usually obvious to the people who do the work — they're the painful, repetitive, time-consuming parts. Ask. The exception isn't worth optimizing for; pick something visible and start.
- We have a small team. Do we hire someone first?
- Usually no. Hiring an AI specialist into a team that hasn't done its first AI workflow rarely produces results — there's no AI-shaped problem yet for them to solve. Better sequence: ship one workflow, document what was hard, then decide whether the next thing needs a hire or an external partner or both.
- Is there a worst version of 'starting'?
- Yes — buying a tool license without picking a use case, hoping the tool will reveal what to do. That's how you get a $2,000/month Copilot bill nobody uses and a board question you can't answer. Pick the use case first; tools second.
Sources
- 88% of organizations regularly use AI in at least one function — The state of AI in 2025: Agents, innovation, and transformation, McKinsey & Company (QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey), 2025
- About 6% of organizations qualify as 'AI high performers' — those attributing 5%+ EBIT impact to AI — The state of AI in 2025: Agents, innovation, and transformation, McKinsey & Company (QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey), 2025
- Roughly two-thirds of organizations have not yet begun scaling AI across the enterprise — The state of AI in 2025: Agents, innovation, and transformation, McKinsey & Company (QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey), 2025
- AI high performers are nearly 3x as likely as others to say their organizations have fundamentally redesigned individual workflows — The state of AI in 2025: Agents, innovation, and transformation, McKinsey & Company (QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey), 2025
- 79% of U.S. companies now use AI — 8 in 10 Employees Say They Need AI Training — After Their Companies Already Rolled Out the Tools, Express Employment Professionals (Harris Poll fielding), 2026
- 62% of HR professionals' organizations are using AI somewhere (39% in HR + 23% elsewhere) — The State of AI in HR 2026, SHRM (Society for Human Resource Management), 2026
Related
→ Start here
Text Rosey to begin.
Rosey is our executive-assistant bot. Text the number below — she'll ask two questions, offer three calendar slots, and put a 30-minute call on Jim's calendar.
Text Rosey · Schedule a call →